Implant Options

What are zygomatic implants, and who are they for?

A method discussed for severe bone loss in the upper jaw; not recommended the same way by every clinic or for every patient

If you have severe bone loss in your upper jaw and have been told 'we recommend zygomatic implants for you', you are probably here to research the option. We have set out, in a neutral way, what zygomatic implants are, when they come up as an option, how they compare with a bone graft and a sinus lift, how they differ from other graft-free placement methods, and what the evidence actually shows. We have also added the questions that will help you make your decision.

Short answer

A zygomatic implant is a method that anchors a long screw, which acts as an artificial tooth root, into the cheekbone (zygoma) rather than the jawbone, for patients with severe bone loss in the upper jaw. It is offered as an alternative to a bone graft or a sinus lift when there is not enough bone left for a conventional implant. It is a surgery that calls for experience, usually carried out under general anaesthetic or deep sedation. The most commonly reported problem is inflammation in the sinus area; before deciding, you should ask the clinic about its experience with this procedure and its complication rates.

When it is recommended
For severe bone loss in the upper jaw
Anaesthetic
Usually general anaesthetic or deep sedation
Most common complication
Inflammation in the sinus area
Evidence level
Based on a small number of small studies

Medically reviewed by Bilge Ilgın, Dentist · Implantology

What zygomatic implants are and how they work

Zygomatic implants are screws much longer than standard implants, reaching several centimetres. They anchor into the cheekbone, the zygoma, instead of the upper jawbone. Unlike the jawbone, the zygoma is much more resistant to bone loss, which is why it is offered as an alternative anchor point for patients with severe bone loss in the upper jaw.

This method comes up when the bone volume remaining in the upper jaw has become too little to support a standard implant, and closing that gap with conventional bone-grafting methods would need a long, multi-stage process. According to a Cochrane review, the main claimed advantage of zygomatic implants is that fixed teeth can be fitted earlier, without the need for a bone graft.

The difference is clear when compared with a bone graft and a sinus lift. In the conventional method, bone is added first, you wait for months, and only then is the implant placed. With zygomatic implants, this waiting period can be removed from the process, because anchorage comes from the already-solid zygoma bone and no extra bone-healing process is needed.

Cochrane's current review found only two small studies on this question, following a total of 71 people over three years. According to these studies, patients who received zygomatic implants got their fixed teeth in a much shorter time, about 1.34 days, compared with an average of 444 days in the group waiting for a bone graft. However, the same review also found a higher complication rate in the zygomatic implant group: roughly four in five people had a complication, compared with about half in the standard implant group. The review itself rates the certainty of this evidence as very low to moderate, and says more studies are needed.

The zygoma bone is not the only way of avoiding a bone graft. In some strategic implant protocols, the need for a graft is removed by angling implants into the sound bone in front of or behind the gap, or by placing them in other dense bone areas such as the pterygoid region of the jaw. This approach does not involve the zygoma bone at all and has a different surgical scope; 3D imaging determines which method suits a given patient.

Surgical scope is another point to bear in mind. Zygomatic implant surgery is technically demanding and calls for experience, and it is usually carried out under general anaesthetic or deep sedation in a hospital setting. This means a different surgical scope and recovery process from a standard implant appointment.

Sinus inflammation stands out as the most commonly reported complication in systematic reviews. Soft tissue problems and fractures in the structures fitted on top of the implants are also documented in the literature. None of this means the method should not be used, but it does add to the number of questions worth asking before you decide.

Who it is recommended for, and who it is not

The breakdown below is the framework generally accepted in the literature and in clinical practice. The final decision rests on the imaging and examination done by the surgical team assessing you.

The tooth can be saved

  • People with severe bone loss in the upper jawZygomatic implants can be considered as an option for patients who no longer have enough bone volume for a standard implant, and for whom conventional bone-grafting methods are thought to take too long.
  • People who find the bone-grafting process too demandingPatients who do not want to go through months of grafting and waiting, and who can accept a higher complication risk in exchange, may prefer this method.
  • People whose general health is suited to general anaestheticBecause the procedure is usually carried out under general anaesthetic or deep sedation, your general health needs to be suited to this.
  • People assessed by an experienced surgical teamBecause it is a technically demanding surgery, results depend heavily on the surgical team's experience; it is worth asking about this directly.

Saving it is unlikely to hold

  • People with an active sinus infectionBecause this surgery works close to the sinus area, it is not carried out while an infection is ongoing; the infection is treated first.
  • People for whom a less invasive method is enoughFor patients missing a single tooth or with limited bone loss, a standard implant or a more limited method is usually enough; a zygomatic implant in this situation can be an unjustified increase in risk.
  • General health not suited to general anaestheticFor patients with serious heart, lung or other systemic problems, the risk of general anaesthetic is assessed separately, and the procedure is not recommended for some patients.
  • People who have had radiotherapy to the head and neckExtensive surgery in an area that has received radiation carries its own risk; in this group, the decision is made together with radiation oncology.

What to do when a clinic recommends zygomatic implants

These steps are not a treatment timetable; they are a framework for your decision-making process. The aim is to work out whether the method being recommended is really necessary.

  1. 1

    Ask for 3D imaging

    Whether you need a zygomatic implant cannot be determined without a CBCT scan assessing how much bone remains and how it is distributed.

  2. 2

    Ask to have a bone graft and other alternatives explained too

    Zygomatic implants are not the only route; you should be told, with reasons, why options such as a bone graft, a sinus lift and graft-free angled placement are not suitable for you.

  3. 3

    Clarify the anaesthetic plan

    Whether general anaesthetic or deep sedation will be used, who decides this, and whether your general health is suited to it: these questions should be clear before surgery.

  4. 4

    Ask about the surgical team's experience

    How many zygomatic implant cases have been carried out, what the complication rates are, and how problems are managed if one arises, are all fair questions to ask.

  5. 5

    Find out the follow-up and revision plan

    The route to be followed if sinus inflammation or another complication develops, any extra cost, and who is responsible, should all be set out in writing beforehand.

Other routes discussed for severe bone loss

Zygomatic implants are not the only option. The following are methods that solve the same problem in different ways.

01

Bone graft and sinus lift

Lost bone volume is rebuilt with a graft, and a standard implant is placed afterwards. This takes longer, but it does not involve the zygoma bone at all.

02

Graft-free angled placement

The need for a graft can be removed by angling implants into the remaining sound bone or placing them in other dense areas of the jaw. This approach does not use the zygoma bone; whether it is suitable is determined by imaging.

03

Short implants

Using an implant short enough to fit the remaining bone height is another way of avoiding both a bone graft and a zygomatic implant; it is not suitable for every case.

04

Full removable denture

A route without surgery. An option for patients not suited to general anaesthetic or who do not want to accept the extra risk; it does not stop the bone loss.

Risks you should know about

The following are the main problems reported in the literature after zygomatic implants. Knowing about them makes your decision easier.

Sinus inflammation

The most commonly reported complication in systematic reviews. This risk can be increased by the sinus membrane being affected during the procedure, or by the implant's position.

Soft tissue problems

Irritation or recession can occur in the gum-like tissue where the implant emerges; regular care reduces this risk.

Fractures in the structures fitted on top

Fracture or screw loosening is reported over time in the fixed prosthesis fitted on top; regular check-ups catch these problems early.

General anaesthetic risk

Because the procedure is usually carried out under general anaesthetic, risks specific to anaesthetic are added to the picture; this risk is assessed according to your general health.

A limited evidence base

In Cochrane's own words, the evidence in this area rests on a small number of small studies, and the certainty of this evidence ranges from very low to moderate. This does not mean the method does not work; it means large comparative studies are still lacking.

What to expect afterwards

The following is the general course described in the literature after zygomatic implants; it can vary by clinic and by case.

  1. The first few days

    The standard recovery process after general anaesthetic, with swelling and tenderness in the surgical area on top of that.

  2. The first week

    Signs related to the sinus area, such as a blocked nose, discharge or facial pain, are watched closely during this period.

  3. The first few months

    The prosthesis is fitted on top and check-ups become more frequent; sinus health and implant stability are assessed regularly.

  4. The long term

    Soft tissue and sinus health need regular monitoring for years afterwards; regular professional care catches complications early.

Message us right away if

  • Persistent blocked nose, discharge or facial pain. This can be a sign of sinus inflammation. Call your clinic without waiting.
  • Fever or increasing swelling. This can be a sign of infection; if the swelling is spreading towards your eye or neck, go straight to A&E.
  • A fracture or looseness in the structure on top. Report this without delay; early action often resolves the problem before it grows.
  • Persistent pain or tenderness around the implant. Pain that is constant and increasing, different from ordinary healing pain, should be assessed.

What determines the cost

We do not give figures on this page; the scope of zygomatic implant treatment varies widely from clinic to clinic. Here are the items that determine the total:

Number of implants and surgical scope
How many zygomatic implants are used, and whether standard implants are also needed, directly affects the cost.
Anaesthetic and hospital process
Surgery carried out under general anaesthetic in a hospital setting carries a different cost item from a procedure done under local anaesthetic.
Imaging and planning
3D imaging and surgical planning are especially critical for this method; a thorough planning process can be a separate item.
Follow-up and possible revision
If a complication such as sinus inflammation or a fractured prosthesis develops, extra treatment may be needed; how this is covered should be made clear from the start.

Frequently asked questions

What is a zygomatic implant?

It is a type of implant, much longer than standard implants, that anchors into the cheekbone (zygoma) instead of the upper jawbone. It is recommended for patients with severe bone loss in the upper jaw to remove the need for a bone graft.

Who are zygomatic implants for?

They are considered for patients who no longer have enough bone in the upper jaw to support a standard implant, who find the conventional bone-grafting process too long, and whose general health is suited to general anaesthetic. They are not used in patients with an active sinus infection.

What is the difference between a zygomatic implant and a sinus lift?

A sinus lift is a method where bone is added first, you wait for months, and a standard implant is placed afterwards. A zygomatic implant anchors into the already-solid zygoma bone, so it largely removes the graft and waiting stage; in exchange, the literature reports a higher complication rate.

Are zygomatic implants safe?

It is an accepted method when carried out by experienced hands, but it is not risk-free. According to Cochrane's review, the complication rate in patients receiving zygomatic implants is higher than in patients receiving a standard implant and a graft; the most common problem is sinus inflammation.

Does a zygomatic implant need general anaesthetic?

Usually yes, or at least deep sedation. This follows from the scope of the procedure and its surgical difficulty; your general health needs to be suited to it.

What is the difference between a zygomatic implant and graft-free angled placement?

Both aim to avoid a bone graft, but they anchor into different bone. A zygomatic implant goes into the cheekbone and usually needs general anaesthetic. Graft-free angled placement, on the other hand, angles implants into the jaw's own dense outer layer or into other basal areas such as the pterygoid region, and does not involve the zygoma bone at all. Which one is suitable is determined by how much bone remains and how it is distributed.

What happens if a zygomatic implant fails?

If a zygomatic implant has to be removed, the area needs to be reassessed; in some cases a second zygomatic implant is discussed, in others a different approach. Getting clear, written answers before the procedure on how this possibility would be managed, whether it would mean extra cost, and who would be responsible, is the most concrete way of protecting yourself.

I have been recommended a zygomatic implant. Should I get a second opinion?

That is a reasonable request. Taking your 3D imaging to another clinic for an opinion helps you understand whether the recommended method is really the only option. This question cannot be answered for certain without seeing how much bone remains and how it is distributed.

Sources

Related pages

Next step

Send your X-ray and we will talk through the options.

Share your CBCT or panoramic X-ray. We will write back within 24 hours on which option is realistic for your tooth.

Apply