Bridgework Material

Teeth on implants: acrylic, zirconia or porcelain?

The implant stays inside the bone; the part you see and use every day, and that is renewed over the years, is the tooth on top

The second question facing a patient who has decided on implants is what the tooth fitted on top will be made of. Acrylic, porcelain and zirconia are often presented as if they were a ranking of quality. In fact, each material behaves differently when it comes to fracture, wear, repair and cleaning, and the right choice is not the same for a single tooth as for a full-mouth bridge. On this page we set the differences, and what research has found, side by side.

Short answer

Teeth on implants are made from four main materials: acrylic teeth on a metal or titanium bar, porcelain fused to metal, zirconia and, for single teeth, glass ceramic. Acrylic is light and can be repaired in the mouth, but it wears faster. Porcelain fused to metal is the option with the longest follow-up; its most common problem is the porcelain fracturing and chipping. With monolithic zirconia this chipping is seen less often, but the long-term data is shorter. The choice is decided by the opposite jaw, teeth grinding and the length of the bridge.

Acrylic
Light and repairable; wears faster
Porcelain fused to metal
Longest follow-up; porcelain can chip
Monolithic zirconia
Less chipping; long-term data is short
What decides the choice
The opposite jaw, teeth grinding, the length of the bridge

Medically reviewed by Bilge Ilgın, Dentist · Implantology

How the materials behave

First, let us separate two terms, because they get mixed up in everyday speech. The implant is the screw inside the bone; the tooth or bridge fitted on top of it is called the bridgework. So the question 'implant or zirconia?' compares two different layers: zirconia is a material for teeth and can be fitted on top of an implant or on top of your own tooth. The subject of this page is only the top layer, that is, what the tooth that goes on the implant is made of.

In full-mouth bridges, acrylic teeth are set on a metal or titanium bar; this is also commonly called a hybrid denture. It is light, absorbs impact to some extent and, when a tooth breaks, it can often be repaired without replacing the whole bridge. In return, it is softer than ceramic: over the years it wears, picks up stains, and the teeth may need renewing. A systematic review comparing it with porcelain-fused-to-metal bridges found that, alongside wear and fractures of the veneering material, inflammation around the implants (peri-implantitis) was also reported more often with acrylic bridges, while there was no significant difference in the loss of implants or bridges.

Porcelain fused to metal is made by building up porcelain on a metal framework, and it is the route that has been used longest for bridges on implants. A systematic review of multi-unit implant bridges still describes this material as the reference option. Its most common problem is the porcelain fracturing or chipping at the edges; in full-mouth bridges, this problem is reported to build up over the years and may need maintenance. If the gum is thin, the metal framework can show through as a grey shadow.

Zirconia is used in two different ways, and the difference between them matters. In the first, porcelain is built up on top of a zirconia framework; here too the weak point is the porcelain layer, and reviews show that chipping is a significant problem with these bridges. In the second, the tooth is milled from a single solid block, that is, monolithic zirconia, and there is no separate layer left on top to chip. For single crowns, monolithic crowns are reported to chip significantly less than layered crowns. In full-mouth bridges the short-term results are positive, but long-term data is still limited.

The hardness of monolithic zirconia is both an advantage and something to watch. It resists fracture, but it does not flex or absorb impact; the load is passed directly to the implants and the opposite jaw. That is why, if you have your own teeth in the opposite jaw, it matters that the surface is well polished and the bite is finely adjusted. In terms of appearance, monolithic zirconia may not let light through as well as layered ceramic; this difference comes up especially with front teeth.

Glass ceramic, especially lithium disilicate, is a material that lets light through very much like a natural tooth, and it is used mostly for single crowns at the front of the mouth. A large meta-analysis of single-tooth implant crowns found no significant difference in short-term survival between glass-ceramic, zirconia and layered ceramic crowns; for resin-based ceramic crowns, however, survival was markedly lower. Glass ceramic is not a preferred material for long bridges or for a full mouth.

The difference between a single tooth and a full-mouth bridge is what changes the choice of material most. For a single crown, the difference between materials is small, and the choice is often made on appearance and how well it matches the neighbouring teeth. In a full-mouth bridge, however, all the teeth in one jaw are carried in one piece, screwed to the implants; weight, repairability, whether it can be removed and refitted, and the load placed on the opposite jaw all come into the calculation. So there is no contradiction in recommending zirconia to the same patient for a single tooth and a different material for a full mouth.

Finally, a distinction to do with timing. In classic immediate loading protocols, for example many All-on-4 and All-on-6 plans, the first bridge fitted is a temporary bridge made of acrylic or a similar resin, and the permanent bridge is made separately months later. The Implant72 protocol has no such interim stage: on days 1 and 2, the shape and bite are settled with try-in teeth, and the teeth fixed to the implants on day 3 are the final teeth. The material comparison on this page applies directly to those final teeth.

Which material comes to the fore for whom

The first list describes the situations in which a material's advantage becomes clear, the second the combinations that call for caution. The decision is made by looking at the examination, the bite and the length of the bridge together.

The tooth can be saved

  • A single tooth in an area that shows when you smileA glass-ceramic or zirconia crown comes to the fore for its translucency and its shade match with the neighbouring teeth. For single teeth, the short-term results of these materials are reported to be close to one another.
  • A full-mouth bridge opposite a removable dentureBecause the force coming from the opposite jaw is lower, acrylic teeth on a bar are a reasonable option for their lightness and repairability. Regular check-ups are planned to watch for wear and discolouration.
  • A full-mouth bridge opposite natural teeth or a fixed bridgeWhen biting force is high, acrylic can wear faster. Porcelain fused to metal or monolithic zirconia are the options often discussed in this situation; the choice between them depends on your expectations for appearance and on teeth grinding.
  • Your priority is fewer repairsBecause monolithic zirconia has no separate veneering layer to chip, chipping is seen less often. For a full mouth, it should be chosen in the knowledge that long-term data is still limited.

Saving it is unlikely to hold

  • Layered porcelain for a patient who grinds their teeth at nightThe force during grinding increases the risk of the porcelain layer fracturing. For these patients, materials without layers and a night guard are discussed together.
  • An acrylic bridge when daily cleaning is a struggleThere is data showing that peri-implantitis is reported more often with acrylic bridges. If interdental cleaning cannot be done regularly, this difference becomes more important.
  • High expectations for the front teeth, with monolithic zirconiaMonolithic zirconia may not let light through as well as layered ceramic. If you expect a highly natural look at the front, designs in which only the visible surface is layered, or glass ceramic, are discussed.
  • Glass ceramic for a long bridgeGlass ceramic is a successful material for single teeth, but it is not preferred for the load carried by long bridges and full-mouth bridges.

How the material is decided

The material is not picked off a shade guide. The sequence below shows which questions the decision comes from.

  1. 1

    How many teeth will be carried

    A single crown, a short bridge and a full-mouth bridge carry different loads. The longer the bridge, the more the weight, flexibility and repairability of the material matter.

  2. 2

    What is in the opposite jaw

    Whether the opposite jaw has natural teeth, a fixed bridge or a removable denture changes the biting force. How the chosen material will interact with the opposing teeth also follows from this.

  3. 3

    Teeth grinding and habits

    Habits such as grinding at night, crunching ice or opening things with your teeth are discussed. If you have any of these, avoiding layered surfaces and wearing a night guard come into it.

  4. 4

    Smile line and expectations for appearance

    Whether the gum shows when you smile, and the length and shade of the teeth, are assessed. In full-mouth bridges, artificial gum can also be part of the design.

  5. 5

    Trying it out at the try-ins

    In the Implant72 protocol, shape, length, speech and shade are tried out with the try-in teeth on days 1 and 2; the design of the final teeth fitted on day 3 is settled from these observations. In classic protocols, the same trial is done with a temporary bridge worn for months.

  6. 6

    Putting the choice in writing

    The material of the final tooth, its framework, whether it is screw-retained or cemented, and how it will be repaired if it fractures should be shared with you in writing.

The materials side by side

None of the materials below is right for every mouth. What makes each one strong can turn into a weakness in a different situation.

01

Acrylic teeth on a bar

Acrylic teeth set on a metal or titanium framework. A light structure that absorbs impact and can be repaired in the mouth. It wears and picks up stains faster than ceramic; the teeth may need renewing over the years.

02

Porcelain fused to metal

Porcelain built up on a metal framework. The option with the longest follow-up for bridges on implants. Its most common problem is chipping of the porcelain; with thin gums, a metal shadow may show.

03

Porcelain-veneered zirconia

Porcelain is built up on top of a zirconia framework, and there is no metal. It looks good; however, reviews show that chipping of the porcelain is a significant problem with these bridges.

04

Monolithic zirconia

The tooth is milled from one piece of zirconia, with no separate veneering layer on top. Chipping is seen less often; it is hard and heavy, and translucency may be limited on front teeth. Long-term data for a full mouth is still short.

05

Glass ceramic

Lets light through very much like a natural tooth. Used especially for single crowns at the front of the mouth; not preferred for long bridges or a full mouth.

06

The temporary bridge in classic protocols

In classic immediate loading protocols that start with a temporary bridge, the first bridge is often made of acrylic or similar resins and is replaced months later with the permanent bridge. The Implant72 protocol has no such interim stage; the teeth fitted on day 3 are the final teeth, and their material is chosen using the criteria on this page.

What you should know when you decide

We write these not to run down any of the materials but so that you can ask the right questions when you read quotes.

The word "zirconia" alone is not enough information

Porcelain-veneered zirconia and monolithic zirconia behave differently. If the quote says zirconia, ask which one it is and whether the surface will be layered on the front teeth.

What breaks is usually not the implant but the tooth on top

Chipped porcelain or a broken acrylic tooth does not mean the implant is lost. But if it keeps happening in the same place, you need to look at the bite and teeth grinding rather than the material.

Maintenance needs vary with the material

In full-mouth bridges, fractures of the veneering are reported to build up over the years and to need regular maintenance. Check-ups and possible repairs should be written into the plan from the start.

Cleaning is essential whatever the material

Whatever it is made of, if the gum around an implant is not kept clean, it becomes inflamed. The fact that this risk is reported to be higher with acrylic bridges makes cleaning even more important there.

Not discussing whether the bridge can be removed

Most full-mouth bridges are screwed to the implants, which means they can be removed for repairs and check-ups. When the material is being chosen, ask whether this possibility is kept.

Care that changes with the material

The period after the final tooth or bridge is fitted needs regular check-ups, whatever the material. Below we set out how the material affects care.

  1. Fitting day

    The bite is adjusted; if the surface has been adjusted, it is polished again. A surface left rough both strains the opposing tooth and holds plaque.

  2. The first weeks

    You get used to speaking and chewing. If a point in the bite touches too early, it is corrected with an adjustment during this period; left as it is, it increases the risk of fracture.

  3. At every check-up

    The tightness of the screws is checked, and the surface is checked for wear, chipping or cracks. With acrylic teeth, wear and discolouration are watched particularly closely, and with porcelain, chipping at the edges.

  4. Over the years

    Acrylic teeth may need renewing; small chips in ceramic surfaces are managed by polishing or repair. Renewing the tooth on top while the implant stays in place is a normal part of the process.

Message us right away if

  • You notice a crack or fracture in a tooth or the bridge. Stop chewing on that side. Even a small chip can leave a sharp edge and spread the load unevenly.
  • The bridge moves or clicks. It may show that a screw has come loose. Carrying on chewing with a loose screw can lead to the screw breaking.
  • One point touches first when you bite. Early contact in the bite increases the risk of the material fracturing; it can usually be corrected with a quick adjustment.
  • The gum bleeds or swells in one area. An area that cannot be cleaned may have formed under the bridge. When it is looked at early, it is easier to bring the inflammation under control.

How the choice of material affects the scope

There are no figures on this page, but the effect of the material on the scope of treatment is concrete. These are the items that set the scope:

Framework and material
Acrylic on a bar, porcelain fused to metal and monolithic zirconia involve different production steps and laboratory work.
Length and number of bridges
The difference between a single crown and a full-mouth bridge is large. If both jaws are treated together, two separate bridges are made.
Whether there is an interim stage
In classic immediate loading plans, a temporary bridge is fitted first and the permanent bridge is made separately months later. In the Implant72 protocol, the final teeth fitted on day 3 are the only bridgework. If you are comparing different quotes, ask in writing how many separate bridges are included.
Repair and renewal
Renewing acrylic teeth over the years and repairing any chips in ceramic affect the scope in the long run. How these will be handled should be discussed from the start.

Frequently asked questions

Porcelain or zirconia on an implant?

There is no single right answer. Porcelain fused to metal is the option with the longest follow-up for bridges on implants; its most common problem is chipping of the porcelain. Because monolithic zirconia has no separate veneering layer, chipping is seen less often, but the long-term data is shorter. For a single tooth the difference is small; for a full-mouth bridge, the opposite jaw and teeth grinding decide it.

Should I have an implant or zirconia?

These two are not alternatives to the same thing. An implant is an artificial root placed in the bone; zirconia is a material that teeth are made from, and it can also be fitted on top of an implant. The question often means 'should I close the gap with a bridge on my own teeth or with an implant?'; we have made that comparison on a separate page.

Are acrylic teeth a bad choice for full-mouth implants?

Not bad, just different. Acrylic is light, absorbs impact and, when a tooth breaks, can often be repaired in the mouth. In return, it wears and picks up stains faster; research shows that peri-implantitis is also reported more often with acrylic bridges. It can be a reasonable option in a jaw opposite a removable denture.

Do zirconia teeth go yellow over time?

Ceramic surfaces such as zirconia and porcelain resist discolouration much better than acrylic. Even so, tea, coffee and smoking stains can build up on the surface; these stains are removed with professional cleaning. They cannot be whitened like natural teeth, so the shade has to be chosen correctly from the start.

What is the difference between monolithic zirconia and porcelain-veneered zirconia?

Monolithic means the tooth is milled from one piece of zirconia; there is no separate porcelain layer on top. With porcelain-veneered zirconia, porcelain is built up on top for appearance, and reviews find that chipping happens in this layer. Monolithic zirconia resists chipping better, but its translucency on front teeth may be more limited.

Can zirconia cause bad breath or an allergy?

Bad breath usually comes not from the material but from areas under the bridge that cannot be cleaned, or from gum inflammation. Because zirconia contains no metal, it is one of the materials discussed for patients in whom a sensitivity to metal is suspected.

Are the teeth fitted on day 3 temporary, and how is their material chosen?

They are not temporary. In the Implant72 protocol, the teeth fixed to the implants on day 3 are the final teeth; no other bridge is made months later to replace them. The try-in teeth on days 1 and 2 are there to settle the shape, the bite and the shade. The material is chosen for these final teeth, and the decision is made by the opposite jaw, teeth grinding and the length of the bridge. Ask in writing, before treatment, which material is planned.

Sources

Related pages

Next step

Send your X-ray and we will talk through the options.

Share your CBCT or panoramic X-ray. We will write back within 24 hours on which option is realistic for your tooth.

Apply