All-on-6 or All-on-4
What is All-on-6? How it differs from All-on-4, and who it suits
Do two more implants mean it is safer? The research gives a more balanced answer than people think
All-on-6 is the umbrella name for plans that replace all the teeth in one jaw with a single fixed bridge screwed to six implants. The number in the name makes it easy to set it beside All-on-4, but the real difference lies not in the number but in how the implants are spread across the jaw. On this page we explain the thinking behind the two plans, what six implants make easier and what they make harder, and what the studies comparing them have found.
Short answer
All-on-6 is a fixed bridge carried by six implants in one jaw. Compared with All-on-4, the implants are spread more widely across the jaw, they are usually placed more upright, and the part of the bridge that extends behind the last implant is shorter. In return, it needs enough bone in more areas; at the back of the upper jaw, this can make adding bone more likely. Systematic reviews comparing the two plans report similar results, but the variation between studies is high. A CBCT scan shows which one is suitable.
- Number of implants
- Six per jaw
- How it differs from All-on-4
- Wider spread, shorter extension
- What it needs
- Enough bone at the back as well
- Research
- Similar results reported for both plans
Medically reviewed by Bilge Ilgın, Dentist · Implantology
The thinking behind All-on-6, and where it parts ways with All-on-4
All-on-6 is the general name given to fixed bridge plans that carry all the teeth in one jaw on six implants. In practice it is used without sticking to a single, standard definition, so two clinics using the same name may mean different things: whether all the implants are upright or the back ones are tilted, and whether the bridge is a single piece or divided into sections. When you compare quotes, you need to ask about these details rather than go by the name itself.
The basic difference from All-on-4 is how the load is distributed. In a four-implant plan, the implants are gathered at the front and middle of the jaw; the two back implants are tilted to avoid the sinus in the upper jaw and the nerve canal in the lower jaw. In a six-implant plan, two more implants are added, usually further back. This spreads the points the bridge rests on along the jaw and divides the load among more supports.
What this means in concrete terms for the bridge is the extension. The part of the bridge that sits behind the last implant works like a lever when you bite and increases the load on the implant furthest back. When there is support at the back as well, this extension gets shorter or is not needed at all. In four-implant plans, some of the back teeth sit on this extension, so the length of the bridge and the bite are planned with particular care.
The second gain from six implants is spare capacity. In a four-implant bridge, losing one implant means losing a quarter of the points the bridge rests on, and the plan has to be reassessed. With six implants, if the number and distribution of the remaining implants are adequate, the bridge can go on being carried for a while; the area of the loss is replanned in the meantime. In some plans, having more implants also makes it possible to make the bridge in sections rather than as a single piece.
The other side of the coin is bone. The areas at the back where the two extra implants go are where bone shrinks most after tooth loss. At the back of the upper jaw the sinus drops down, and at the back of the lower jaw the nerve canal comes closer to the surface of the bone. If these areas lack the height a conventional implant needs, a six-implant plan either requires a sinus lift (sinus floor elevation) and adding bone, or is adapted by tilting the back implants as well. A systematic review reports that bone loss around tilted implants is not significantly different from bone loss around upright implants.
So are six implants safer? Research does not answer this question with as clear a yes as people assume. Using four to six implants for a full-mouth fixed bridge has been a well-documented option for a long time. A comprehensive systematic review found no significant difference in implant or bridge survival between fewer than five implants per jaw and five or more. A 2026 meta-analysis directly comparing All-on-4 with All-on-6 also reports similar results for the two plans; however, it stresses that the variation between studies is high and that the results should be interpreted with caution.
This result does not mean 'the number makes no difference'; it shows that the number is not decisive on its own. The patients in the studies were put on a plan because they were judged suitable for it: four implants were placed in jaws with enough bone at the front, and six in jaws that also had bone at the back. So the right question is not 'four or six?' but whether your jaw has the bone to carry six implants, and whether an additional procedure is needed for that.
The strategic implant is a third route in this debate. Because it takes its anchorage not from the volume of spongy bone but from the hard outer layer of the jaw, the implants can be spread across the whole jaw even if the bone at the back has shrunk. In this approach the number of implants is not limited to four or six; the load is usually shared among a larger number of thin implants and, if the anchorage is adequate, a fixed bridge can be fitted the same week. With this method, as used at Implant72, the teeth fitted on day 3 are the final teeth; no second bridge is made months later to replace them.
Who All-on-6 suits, and when it gets harder
The first list describes the situations in which the advantage of a six-implant plan becomes clear, the second the situations in which another route may be more appropriate. Both become clear after a CBCT scan.
The tooth can be saved
- There is enough bone at the back as wellIf the teeth were lost recently or bone shrinkage is limited, implants can be placed at the back without an additional procedure. In this situation, six implants make a bridge with a short extension possible.
- The opposite jaw has natural teeth or a fixed bridgeThe biting force coming from the opposite jaw is high. Dividing the load among more supports is an option often discussed in this situation.
- An upper jaw with low bone densityThe bone of the upper jaw is more porous than that of the lower jaw. When the anchorage expected from each individual implant is lower, increasing the number of implants is a common approach.
- You want the bridge divided into sectionsIn some plans, six implants make it possible to make the bridge in two or three sections. If a problem arises in one section, only that section needs to be dealt with.
Saving it is unlikely to hold
- The bone at the back has shrunk severelySix implants need a sinus lift or added bone, and the timeline stretches by months. In this situation, a four-implant plan with tilted implants, or a plan that takes its anchorage from the deep layer, is discussed.
- The surgery needs to be kept smallIf your general health makes extensive surgery difficult, a plan involving fewer areas may come to the fore. The decision is made together with the patient's own doctor if necessary.
- Daily cleaning will not be done regularlyEach implant means one more point under the bridge that needs cleaning. If an interdental brush and a water flosser will not be used regularly, more implants also means a larger area over which the risk of inflammation can spread.
- Gum inflammation or a systemic illness that is not under controlThe inflammation is treated first, and values such as blood sugar are brought under control. This point changes not the number of implants but the order of things.
Four or six: how the decision is made
This sequence is for the decision, not for the treatment. At the end of it you know how many implants are planned, where, and on what grounds.
- 1
A three-dimensional CBCT scan
The height, width and density of the bone are measured in every area of the jaw. The position of the sinus and the nerve canal shows whether the two extra implants can be placed without an additional procedure.
- 2
The bite and the opposite jaw
What is in the opposite jaw, how you bite and whether you grind your teeth at night are assessed. The greater the load, the stronger the case for increasing the number.
- 3
Designing the bridge
How many teeth the bridge will carry and how long an extension will be left behind the last implant are drawn up. The positions of the implants are worked out from this design, not the other way round.
- 4
Setting the options side by side
For the same jaw, a four-implant tilted plan, a six-implant plan and, if needed, a plan with added bone are discussed, each with the additional procedures and timeline it involves.
- 5
Measuring anchorage during placement
The resistance of each implant as it seats in the bone is measured. In an area where the expected value is not reached, the plan may change; whether the bridge is fitted in the first week depends on this measurement.
- 6
Sharing the plan in writing
How many implants, in which areas, at what angle, with what bridge material and whether an additional procedure is needed should be given to you in writing.
The plans on the table for a full mouth
None of the plans below is superior to the others in every case. The difference between them is what bone they need and how they share the load.
All-on-4
Four implants per jaw, with the back ones tilted. Developed to get round the bone problem at the back; it needs enough bone at the front. The back part of the bridge has an extension.
All-on-6
Six implants per jaw; the load is spread over a wider base and the extension is shorter. It needs bone at the back as well; otherwise, adding bone or tilted placement comes into it.
Eight or more implants
Used especially in the upper jaw, in plans where the bridge is divided into several sections. It needs more surgical sites and more bone.
Strategic implant
Thin, one-piece implants lock into the hard outer layer of the jaw and are spread across the whole jaw. Because anchorage does not depend on bone volume, adding bone is not needed in most cases, even in jaws where the bone at the back has shrunk; the bridge can be fitted the same week. In the Implant72 protocol, this is the final bridge fitted on day 3.
Removable denture on implants
A denture that sits on two to four implants with attachments and is taken out for cleaning. The surgery is smaller; in return, the denture is not fixed and the attachments are replaced over time.
What you should know when you decide
We write these so that you can ask the right questions at whichever clinic you go to.
The idea that "six implants are always safer than four"
The studies comparing them do not show a clear difference in survival between the two plans. The advantage of six implants shows in a jaw that has the bone to carry them; if the bone is not there, two extra implants mean an extra procedure.
Not asking what the name means
When All-on-6 is mentioned, the distribution and angle of the implants and the structure of the bridge can vary from clinic to clinic. Ask for these details to be written into the quote.
Not asking whether the plan starts with a temporary bridge
In the classic All-on-4 and All-on-6 protocols, the first bridge fitted after immediate loading is often temporary; the permanent bridge is made over the following months, once the gum and bone have settled. In the Implant72 protocol, by contrast, the teeth fitted on day 3 are the final teeth. Ask from the start which of these the quote in front of you includes.
More points to clean
Under a six-implant bridge, the areas around six separate implants have to be cleaned. Peri-implantitis progresses silently; increasing the number does not lighten the care, it multiplies it.
An implant can be lost
As with every implant plan, there is a chance of failure here too. Smoking, uncontrolled diabetes and neglected care are known to increase the risk.
What to expect afterwards
The course below describes a classic All-on-6 immediate loading plan that starts with a temporary bridge. In the Implant72 protocol, the final teeth are fitted on day 3 and there is no stage of moving from a temporary bridge to a permanent one; afterwards there are only check-ups. If bone has been added, or if fusion has to be waited for, the timeline stretches by months.
Surgery and the first days
All the implants are placed in the same session. If the anchorage is adequate, a fixed bridge is fitted within the first week. Swelling and tenderness are in proportion to the area the surgery covers; implants placed at the back widen that area.
The first weeks
You start with soft food, and the chewing load is increased step by step. Hard food is avoided: the implants have only just been placed, and in classic plans the temporary bridge is also more fragile than the permanent one.
Moving to the permanent bridge in the classic plan
In classic plans, the permanent bridge is made once the gum and bone have settled into their new shape, and the timing of the change is decided at check-ups. In the Implant72 protocol this step does not exist; the final teeth have been in the mouth since day 3, and during this period there are only check-ups.
The long term
The tightness of the screws, the bite and the bone around the implants are checked at regular intervals. An interdental brush and a water flosser are a permanent part of daily care.
Message us right away if
- Swelling increases after the third day. The expected course is for it to go down. An increase may be a sign of infection and needs to be assessed.
- You feel movement in the bridge. A fixed bridge does not move. Movement may show that a screw has come loose or that an implant has lost its anchorage; stop chewing on that side.
- You have a runny or blocked nose on one side (upper jaw). If implants were placed at the back of the upper jaw or the sinus floor was raised, these symptoms mean the sinus area needs to be assessed.
- Numbness does not wear off. If implants were placed at the back of the lower jaw and numbness in your lip or chin is still there the next day, report it that same day.
What sets the scope
There are no figures on this page, but the difference in scope between the two plans is concrete. These are the items that set the scope:
- Number of implants and number of jaws
- Compared with four implants, six mean two more surgical sites, two more implants and two more connecting components. Whether one jaw or both are treated doubles this difference.
- Additional procedures at the back
- If a sinus lift or added bone is needed for six implants, the scope widens markedly and the timeline gets longer. Whether it is needed is decided after the CBCT scan.
- The material and structure of the bridge
- Bridges of different materials can be made on the same number of implants; whether the bridge is a single piece or in sections also changes how it is made.
- The temporary bridge stage
- In classic immediate loading plans, a temporary bridge is made first and the permanent bridge months later; whether both are included in the scope should be set out in writing from the start. In the Implant72 protocol, the final teeth fitted on day 3 are the only bridgework, and there is no separate item for a temporary bridge.
Frequently asked questions
All-on-6 or All-on-4?
There is no answer that holds for everyone. Systematic reviews comparing them report similar survival for the two plans. If there is enough bone at the back, six implants spread the load over a wider base; if there is not, a four-implant tilted plan can be a way of avoiding an additional procedure. The decision is made not on the number but on the bone seen on the CBCT scan.
How many teeth does All-on-6 have?
The number of teeth is not the same as the number of implants. Six implants carry a bridge that replaces all the visible teeth in a jaw; whether the molars furthest back are included in the bridge is decided by the bite and the length of the extension.
Do you need bone graft material with All-on-6?
Not if there is enough bone at the back. If the sinus has dropped down at the back of the upper jaw or the bone has shrunk, a sinus lift or added bone may come into it so that six implants can be placed. The alternatives are tilting the back implants or taking the anchorage from the deep hard layer.
Can it be done on the upper and lower jaws at the same time?
It can, and it has the advantage that the bite is built for both jaws together. The session is longer and healing is spread over both jaws. Your general health is part of this decision.
If an implant is lost, does the bridge have to come out?
In a six-implant plan, if the number and distribution of the remaining implants are adequate, the bridge can often go on being used; the area of the loss is assessed separately. In a four-implant plan, the same loss is the loss of a quarter of the points the bridge rests on, and the plan has to be reassessed.
With All-on-6, are the teeth fitted on the same day?
If adequate anchorage is measured when the implants are placed, a fixed bridge can be fitted within the first week. In classic All-on-6 plans, this first bridge is often temporary and the permanent bridge is made over the following months. In the Implant72 protocol, by contrast, the teeth fitted on day 3 are the final teeth, and afterwards there are only check-ups. If the anchorage is not adequate, fusion is waited for first.
How should I read All-on-6 experiences online?
One person's experience has to do with their bone, their bite and their care habits; plans carried out under the same name can also differ from one another. As you read, look at how many implants were placed and where, whether the bridge described is temporary or permanent, and how long after treatment the account was written.
Sources
- International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAll-on-4 and All-on-6 implant-supported fixed prostheses for the edentulous jaw: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Clinical Oral Implants ResearchNumber of implants placed for complete-arch fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Clinical Oral Implants ResearchWhat is the optimal number of implants for fixed reconstructions: a systematic review
- European Journal of Oral ImplantologyThe fate of marginal bone around axial vs. tilted implants: a systematic review
- Cleveland ClinicDental Implants: Types, Purpose & Benefits
Related pages
- Compare Your OptionsWhat Is All-on-4 and How Is It Different from Strategic Implants?All-on-4 carries a fixed bridge on four implants and anchors in spongy bone. A strategic implant locks into the hard outer layer. How the two methods differ, and how to decide.
- Making the DecisionHow Many Implants Do You Need for a Full Mouth?The number of implants you need is not set by a price list but by the jaw, bone density, the length of the bridge and the load from the opposing jaw. We explain how the number is decided.
- Not Enough BoneIs a Sinus Lift Essential? When It Is Needed and When It Is NotHow the sinus cavity at the back of the upper jaw affects implants, what open and closed sinus lifts are, when a sinus lift can be avoided and what decides it.
Send your X-ray and we will tell you which option is realistic for your tooth.
Get an assessmentNext step
Send your X-ray and we will talk through the options.
Share your CBCT or panoramic X-ray. We will write back within 24 hours on which option is realistic for your tooth.
