The Ihde Method

Why is what you read about the Ihde method so polarised?

Either glowing praise or harsh criticism: we wrote this page for anyone caught in between

Everyone who looks into this method runs into the same thing: 'it changed my life' posts in one place, scathing criticism in another, and nothing in between. You will not find made-up patient reviews on this page, because we do not write them. Instead, we explain how to weigh up what you read, where patients genuinely struggle and where the debate within the profession stands.

Short answer

Accounts of this method cluster at the two extremes because only a limited number of clinics offer it, it is less widespread than conventional implantology, and most people who write about it are either very happy or feel badly let down. The ordinary experiences in between rarely get written up. When you weigh up a review, look for four things: how long ago the treatment was, how many implants were placed, whether the patient has kept up with check-ups, and whether they also say what went wrong.

Why so polarised
Few clinics, few independent accounts
What to look for in a review
Time since treatment, number of implants, check-ups, what went wrong
What patients find hardest
Swelling on days 2–3, speech, eating soft food
Not on this page
Made-up patient reviews

Medically reviewed by Bilge Ilgın, Dentist · Implantology

Understanding why the accounts are so polarised

The first reason is numbers. Far fewer clinics offer this method than offer conventional implantology, so fewer patients tell their story. In a small sample the extremes dominate: people who are happy write, people who feel let down write, and nobody whose treatment went unremarkably writes anything. The same is true of any niche treatment, and it does not show that the method is good or bad; it only shows how the information in front of you was gathered.

The second reason is that some of the writing is biased. Much of the content in this area is produced either by clinics that offer the method or by clinics that do not and sell an alternative. Both are defending their own work. We are a clinic that does this work too, and we say so plainly: as you read this page, bear in mind that we are an interested party as well.

The third reason is that there is a genuine debate within the profession. Corticobasal placement and immediate loading have been studied, published on and taught for decades; even so, the method has not gained the wide acceptance that conventional implantology has, and the number of long-term comparative studies is limited. We say this rather than hide it, because a patient doing their research will find this debate anyway, and not hearing about it from us would destroy their trust.

The fourth reason is a gap in expectations. Some of the disappointment in these accounts comes not from the method but from something nobody explained at the start: leaving the clinic with your final fixed teeth on day three does not mean healing is over. A patient who did not know this mistakes the swelling in the first few days, the change in their speech or the period of soft food for a problem, and feels misled. That is a communication problem, not a problem with the method, but it does not look that way in the review you are reading.

So what do patients actually find hard? In our clinical experience, these come up most often: swelling that increases on the second and third day, which people do not expect; some sounds coming out differently in the first few days; eating being limited to soft food for the first few weeks; and getting used to how the new teeth feel when biting taking a few weeks. All four are temporary, and all four stop being a problem when you are told about them at the start.

The benefit mentioned most often is not the one you might expect: patients usually talk about taste rather than chewing. For someone moving from a denture that covers the roof of the mouth to fixed teeth, getting the taste of food back means more than being able to bite into hard foods. Second on the list is no longer putting a hand over their mouth when they smile.

When you weigh up a review

The points below separate the accounts that are useful from those that are not. The rule is simple: a review with no dates and no detail carries no information.

The tooth can be saved

  • Accounts written at least a year after treatmentA review written the day after the teeth are fitted only describes a first impression. With this treatment, the real information emerges after the first year: has the bite settled, has a screw come loose, has the bone level been maintained?
  • Accounts that say how many implants were placedOne jaw or both, and with how many implants. Without this you cannot compare two experiences; a bridge supported by six implants and a bridge supported by ten are not the same thing.
  • Accounts that say whether the patient kept up with check-upsThe long-term result depends not only on the work done but also on the check-ups that follow. Did the person writing the review go to their check-ups, and if a night guard was planned, did they wear it? The result of years without check-ups is not the same thing as the result of the method.
  • Accounts that also describe something that went wrongAn account that is entirely positive or entirely negative is usually incomplete. A review that also says what was difficult is more trustworthy, and that includes its praise.

Saving it is unlikely to hold

  • Accounts that do not name the clinicThe same method gives very different results in different hands; with one-piece implants in particular, a planning error cannot be undone. An experience that does not say which clinic carried out the treatment tells you little about the method.
  • Claims without before and after photosVerdicts such as 'it turned out perfect' or 'it was a disaster' cannot be verified without pictures. The photos also need to be dated.
  • What clinics selling the alternative writeHarsh criticism from a clinic that does not offer the method is just as biased as lavish praise from a clinic that does. Read both with the same critical eye; that applies to what we write as well.
  • One-line reviewsA review that does not say what was done, when it was done and what happened afterwards is an impression, not information. Give it only that much weight when you make your decision.

How to get to real information

Rather than reading online, you can ask directly. You can ask any clinic for the following.

  1. 1

    Ask for dated case photos

    Before, on the day the teeth were fitted and, if possible, a year later. A clinic that only shows photos from the fitting day is showing you the easiest moment of the process.

  2. 2

    Ask to speak to a patient treated for a similar situation

    At most clinics it is possible to talk to a patient who was treated for a mouth similar to yours. If the request is turned down, that may be understandable; but if it is never discussed at all, that tells you something too.

  3. 3

    Ask how many cases they have treated

    With this method, experience shows directly in the result. How many full-mouth cases the clinic treats each year tells you more than any debate about implant brands.

  4. 4

    Ask what they do when a case runs into problems

    A clinic that says it has never had a problem has either treated very few cases or is not telling the truth. The answer that really matters is how the process works when a problem does arise.

  5. 5

    Ask for what is included and what happens after fitting in writing

    What is included in the price, what the final teeth are made of, and which check-ups follow the fitting and when: get these in writing. Most accounts of disappointment arise because nobody got answers to these questions at the start.

  6. 6

    Ask when you would not be suitable

    Could this be wrong for me, and in what situation would you suggest a different route? Walk away from a clinic that answers this question with 'it suits everyone'.

Options you can look at for comparison

It is hard to judge a method on its own; it makes more sense when you look at it alongside the alternatives.

01

Experiences of conventional implants

There is a much larger pool of accounts, and they are easy to read. Pay attention to the timescale when you compare: conventional treatment is spread over months, so the experience is told at a different pace too.

02

All-on-4 experiences

This is the other protocol that patients looking for full-mouth fixed teeth come across most often. The differences lie in the number of implants and where the anchorage comes from, and accounts of the experience diverge on these two points as well.

03

Experiences of removable dentures

These accounts are especially valuable, because most patients who move to a fixed solution come from dentures. Having the roof of the mouth covered, the denture moving and loss of taste are the three things mentioned most often.

04

Our own cases

The cases page on this site shows photos of our own patients. These are cases we selected, and we say so openly; at your consultation you can ask us to show you more cases similar to yours.

The honest picture you need to know

This section could be read as working against us. We are writing it anyway, because a patient doing their research will find these points elsewhere.

The method is not as widespread as conventional implantology

The number of dentists who perform it is limited, and there are fewer long-term comparative studies than in conventional implantology. That does not mean the method does not work; it means the pool of evidence is smaller.

The result depends heavily on who carries it out

With a one-piece design, the angle cannot be corrected afterwards. The same method gives noticeably different results in experienced and inexperienced hands. Some of the bad experiences you read about stem from this rather than from the method.

Finding care elsewhere can be harder

If you move to another city or country, finding a dentist who knows this system may be harder than with conventional implants. That is one more reason why keeping your records matters.

Expectations about the first days of healing

This is the most common cause of disappointment in these accounts, and it is a preventable one. You leave the clinic with your final fixed teeth on day three, but the swelling, getting used to speaking and the period of soft food carry on for a while; patients who know this from the start do not experience the same process as a problem.

How recovery really goes, as patients describe it

The timeline below is based on our clinical observation; it varies by a few days from person to person.

  1. The first two days: the part that surprises people most

    Swelling increases on the second and third day, then goes down. Patients who are not expecting it think things are getting worse. This is the expected course; if you know about it beforehand, the discomfort is the same but the worry goes away.

  2. The first week: speech and eating

    Some sounds come out differently and settle within a few days. Eating is limited to soft food. The question asked most often in this week is 'will it always be like this?', and the answer is no.

  3. The first month: getting used to it

    Chewing returns to normal and speech settles down. This is usually when patients first say 'I've got used to it'.

  4. The first year and beyond: where the real information is

    This is the period that shows whether the bite has held, whether any screws have come loose and whether the bone level has stayed stable. It is the reason we ask you to check the date when you read a review.

Message us right away if

  • Your experience does not match what is described. If things are going differently from what you expected, call your clinic. The place to make comparisons is not the internet but your own check-up records.
  • Swelling increases after the third day. That is outside the expected course. If you also have a high temperature or a bad taste in your mouth, let the clinic know the same day.
  • The bridge moves or clicks. A fixed bridge does not move. Loosening that is spotted early is resolved with a short procedure.
  • You have no clear check-up schedule. If you were not given a check-up schedule based on the clinic's follow-up plan when your treatment was completed on day 3, ask for one in writing. Small changes in your bite can be put right with a quick adjustment when they are caught in time.

When reviews talk about price

Price comparisons in these accounts are often misleading, because they are not comparing like with like. When you compare, look at the following:

What the price includes
Of two figures that look the same, one may not cover imaging, extractions or a night guard, and the material of the final teeth changes the figure too. This is the most common reason for price differences in these accounts.
How many implants, how many jaws
The difference between one jaw and two is large. If the person writing the review does not say which, you cannot compare the figure with your own situation.
Travel and accommodation
For patients coming from another city or from abroad, this item can be larger than the difference between quotes, and it is almost never mentioned in reviews.
Care in the years that follow
Check-ups and possible repairs are part of the total. If a review only describes the first payment, it is only telling you half the bill.

Frequently asked questions

Why are there no patient reviews on this page?

Because we do not make them up, and we do not publish our real patients' accounts without their permission. The cases page on this site shows photos of our own cases; at your consultation you can ask to see more cases similar to yours.

I have read some very harsh criticism online. Is it true?

Some of it is based on real experiences, and some of it was written by those selling the alternative. The way to tell them apart is to look at the detail: if a review gives dates, the number of implants, the clinic's name and a specific account of what went wrong, take it seriously.

Is this method controversial?

There is debate within the profession, and we do not hide it. Corticobasal placement and immediate loading have been studied and taught for many years, but the method has not gained the wide acceptance that conventional implantology has, and there are fewer long-term comparative studies. Make your decision knowing this.

What do patients complain about most?

Three things they did not expect: swelling increasing on the second and third day, some sounds coming out differently in the first few days, and eating being limited to soft food for the first few weeks. All three are temporary, and all three stop being a problem when you are told about them at the start.

What do patients like most?

The answer is not what you might expect: they usually talk about taste rather than chewing. For someone moving on from a denture that covers the roof of the mouth, getting the taste of food back is what stands out. Second comes no longer putting a hand over their mouth when they smile.

Can I talk to your patients?

We can discuss this at your consultation. Some of our patients agree to it; we do not pressure anyone, and we do not share their personal details without permission. Talking to someone who was treated for a situation similar to yours will be more use to you than a hundred reviews.

What happens if a problem comes up after treatment?

Before treatment, we give you in writing how the process works: which situations are covered by the guarantee, how check-ups are run, and what is done if a screw loosens or the bridge breaks. We suggest you ask every clinic this question.

Sources

Related pages

Next step

Send your X-ray and we will talk through the options.

Share your CBCT or panoramic X-ray. We will write back within 24 hours on which option is realistic for your tooth.

Apply